Editorial Correction

May 1, 2008
A reader recently wrote in with a question about the April 2008 issue Code Quandaries department, pointing out a possible error in the calculations for sizing the 90C conductor ampacity. Per the author, there was an inadvertent error in the text. Right above Step 4 on page 46, the number 420A in the calculation should have been 475A. This error did not affect the final answer.

A reader recently wrote in with a question about the April 2008 issue “Code Quandaries” department, pointing out a possible error in the calculations for sizing the 90°C conductor ampacity. Per the author, there was an inadvertent error in the text. Right above “Step 4” on page 46, the number 420A in the calculation should have been 475A. This error did not affect the final answer.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Electrical Conduit Comparison Chart

CHAMPION FIBERGLASS electrical conduit is a lightweight, durable option that provides lasting savings when compared to other materials. Compare electrical conduit types including...

Fiberglass Electrical Conduit Chemical Resistance Chart

This information is provided solely as a guide since it is impossible to anticipate all individual site conditions. For specific applications which are not covered in this guide...

Considerations for Direct Burial Conduit

Installation type plays a key role in the type of conduit selected for electrical systems in industrial construction projects. Above ground, below ground, direct buried, encased...

How to Calculate Labor Costs

Most important to accurately estimating labor costs is knowing the approximate hours required for project completion. Learn how to calculate electrical labor cost.