Photo credit: Nordroden/iStock/Thinkstock
Ecmweb 16893 Thinkstockphotos 862370614motorlineupwebversion 0
Ecmweb 16893 Thinkstockphotos 862370614motorlineupwebversion 0
Ecmweb 16893 Thinkstockphotos 862370614motorlineupwebversion 0
Ecmweb 16893 Thinkstockphotos 862370614motorlineupwebversion 0
Ecmweb 16893 Thinkstockphotos 862370614motorlineupwebversion 0

Managing Motor Alignment Issues

Oct. 20, 2017
You should be doing more than just vibration analysis to determine if any motor installations have an alignment problem.

A common misconception is that vibration analysis will always tell you when there’s an alignment problem with a motor installation. Although vibration analysis is essential to a good motor maintenance program and will reveal most alignment issues, it doesn’t tell the whole story.

If you own a car or truck, you’ve probably taken it in for an alignment. If you’ve done this a few times, you’ve probably been surprised at least once that the alignment was out of spec. “The car drives just fine! I never noticed any vibration.” Yet, you can read the alignment data for yourself. There’s a big difference between before and after. You drive home, and don’t notice any difference from the drive in there.

Couplings are typically designed to compensate for minor misalignments. They compensate by changing the angle of applied force. If you were to draw the vectors on paper, you’d see the mechanical equivalent of power factor.

In this case, it’s not capacitance or inductance changing the vector angle and thus reducing the “real power.” It’s mechanical redirection of the force, reducing the “real” torque. So the motor must turn a little harder to drive the same load, just as with power factor.

To borrow terms from power factor analysis, the difference between the “real” torque and the “apparent” torque is rotational energy that is converted to waste heat.

To ensure you don’t have an alignment problem, you need to test the alignment. Minor misalignments can go undetected for a very long time, all the while wasting energy and reducing overall reliability.

Unfortunately, alignments take time. If you want them done right, they also require an investment in test equipment and training (unless you outsource them).

The main appeal of using vibration testing or monitoring to avoid periodic alignment testing is you don’t have to take the equipment out of service. But how many times is that same equipment taken out of service for other reasons? Use those downtime windows to check alignment. You save energy and improve reliability by using vibration testing and vibration monitoring in addition to alignment testing, not instead of it.

A 200 HP motor may be correctly aligned upon installation, but it is unlikely to stay that way. Many factors contribute to misalignment, and you should expect it to occur over time. If you don’t know how often to realign specific installations, then track the alignment results in your computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) and trend them over time. Then adjust the testing frequency based on how long the trends show an alignment is likely to last before drifting out of spec.

About the Author

Mark Lamendola

Mark is an expert in maintenance management, having racked up an impressive track record during his time working in the field. He also has extensive knowledge of, and practical expertise with, the National Electrical Code (NEC). Through his consulting business, he provides articles and training materials on electrical topics, specializing in making difficult subjects easy to understand and focusing on the practical aspects of electrical work.

Prior to starting his own business, Mark served as the Technical Editor on EC&M for six years, worked three years in nuclear maintenance, six years as a contract project engineer/project manager, three years as a systems engineer, and three years in plant maintenance management.

Mark earned an AAS degree from Rock Valley College, a BSEET from Columbia Pacific University, and an MBA from Lake Erie College. He’s also completed several related certifications over the years and even was formerly licensed as a Master Electrician. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and past Chairman of the Kansas City Chapters of both the IEEE and the IEEE Computer Society. Mark also served as the program director for, a board member of, and webmaster of, the Midwest Chapter of the 7x24 Exchange. He has also held memberships with the following organizations: NETA, NFPA, International Association of Webmasters, and Institute of Certified Professional Managers.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Electrical Conduit Comparison Chart

CHAMPION FIBERGLASS electrical conduit is a lightweight, durable option that provides lasting savings when compared to other materials. Compare electrical conduit types including...

Don't Let Burn-Through Threaten Another Data Center or Utility Project

Get the No Burn-Through Elbow eGuide to learn many reasons why Champion Fiberglass elbows will enhance your data center and utility projects today.

Considerations for Direct Burial Conduit

Installation type plays a key role in the type of conduit selected for electrical systems in industrial construction projects. Above ground, below ground, direct buried, encased...

How to Calculate Labor Costs

Most important to accurately estimating labor costs is knowing the approximate hours required for project completion. Learn how to calculate electrical labor cost.