Ecmweb 14427 Thinkstockphotos 478525238webversion
Ecmweb 14427 Thinkstockphotos 478525238webversion
Ecmweb 14427 Thinkstockphotos 478525238webversion
Ecmweb 14427 Thinkstockphotos 478525238webversion
Ecmweb 14427 Thinkstockphotos 478525238webversion

Training Strengths versus Training Weaknesses

June 14, 2017
Can you identify what’s wrong with the following story?

Jim had taken a special interest in PLCs and had shown a remarkable aptitude for solving PLC-related problems. His supervisor noted, “He’s got several of his own books on it and keeps wanting PLC training.”

Photo credit: Kuzmichstudio/iStock/Thinkstock

The company’s customer base has plenty of PLCs, but the company policy is that all employees get the same training. This is based on the common wisdom, expressed on a wall poster, “Anyone can do anything, if they get the training and apply themselves.”

Because Jim already has completed the PLC track, his training this year will focus on where he is weak. That area is basically mechanical, so he’ll go to a hydraulics class and also take a general mechanics course.

This situation is typical in many firms.

People often are weak in an area for reasons that training cannot fix. Using limited resources to try to fix that weakness wastes those resources and frustrates the employee. Different people have different aptitudes; people are not interchangeable parts. But you could hardly tell that from the policies of many companies.

What you want to do instead is identify where people are strong and then provide a structured training program to make them even stronger in those areas. Make use of their natural and existing competencies, and use training to improve in those areas.

By taking this approach, you get much more bang for your training buck. The training is more effective for the trainee, and you avoid the demotivation that comes when workers are trained in something they don’t have the aptitude to do well.

There are a few areas in which all employees should receive training, such as are core job training areas. Safety is a core area, but note that the degree of safety training (and course content) varies by employee responsibility. Some employees will need specific training that others do not, depending upon the task to be performed and other factors.

Don’t use training as an excuse for sloppy hiring. Hire people who have the basic aptitudes and attitudes you need, then use training to elevate them from “good” to “excellent” in those areas.

The typical hiring practices focus on identifying credentials rather than abilities. How many times have you been burned by this? Always give a practical test if you’re hiring people to do practical work. This will help you to sort the low-aptitude people from the high-aptitude people. For example if your prospective hire for a mechanic job can’t identify a 10mm socket just by looking at it, you probably shouldn’t hire that person.

If your people interact with customers, then communication training would probably help them do that better. Employees with poor social skills shouldn’t be interacting with your customers. Training isn’t going to help them, so don’t hire such people for that kind of work. Such people may be well-suited for many other kinds of work environments.

Put people in jobs where they can naturally shine, then train them to shine brilliantly.

About the Author

Mark Lamendola

Mark is an expert in maintenance management, having racked up an impressive track record during his time working in the field. He also has extensive knowledge of, and practical expertise with, the National Electrical Code (NEC). Through his consulting business, he provides articles and training materials on electrical topics, specializing in making difficult subjects easy to understand and focusing on the practical aspects of electrical work.

Prior to starting his own business, Mark served as the Technical Editor on EC&M for six years, worked three years in nuclear maintenance, six years as a contract project engineer/project manager, three years as a systems engineer, and three years in plant maintenance management.

Mark earned an AAS degree from Rock Valley College, a BSEET from Columbia Pacific University, and an MBA from Lake Erie College. He’s also completed several related certifications over the years and even was formerly licensed as a Master Electrician. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and past Chairman of the Kansas City Chapters of both the IEEE and the IEEE Computer Society. Mark also served as the program director for, a board member of, and webmaster of, the Midwest Chapter of the 7x24 Exchange. He has also held memberships with the following organizations: NETA, NFPA, International Association of Webmasters, and Institute of Certified Professional Managers.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Electrical Conduit Comparison Chart

CHAMPION FIBERGLASS electrical conduit is a lightweight, durable option that provides lasting savings when compared to other materials. Compare electrical conduit types including...

Fiberglass Electrical Conduit Chemical Resistance Chart

This information is provided solely as a guide since it is impossible to anticipate all individual site conditions. For specific applications which are not covered in this guide...

Considerations for Direct Burial Conduit

Installation type plays a key role in the type of conduit selected for electrical systems in industrial construction projects. Above ground, below ground, direct buried, encased...

How to Calculate Labor Costs

Most important to accurately estimating labor costs is knowing the approximate hours required for project completion. Learn how to calculate electrical labor cost.