Ecmweb 8400 Guidryxferlarge
Ecmweb 8400 Guidryxferlarge
Ecmweb 8400 Guidryxferlarge
Ecmweb 8400 Guidryxferlarge
Ecmweb 8400 Guidryxferlarge

Transformer Secondary Conductor Protection for Systems Operating at Greater Than 1,000V

Aug. 24, 2016
Don’t use the NEC requirements for secondary conductors and tap rules.

Transformer secondary conductor protection for voltage levels less than 1,000V is adequately covered in Art. 240 of the National Electrical Code (NEC) – more specifically, Sec. 240.21(C)(4). There are several options for protecting the secondary conductors at low voltage levels (see Parts II and VIII of Art. 240). However, protecting transformer secondary conductors that operate on systems greater than 1,000V is less clear.

This photo shows a typical medium-voltage metal enclosed bus duct section prior to installation.

In industrial facilities, it is common to have bus duct or cable bus supplying power from the secondary side of a transformer to switchgear at the 4,160V and 13.8kV levels. But it’s a common mistake on the design engineer’s part to utilize the secondary conductor rules found in Art. 240 for voltage levels above 1,000V.

Article 240 addresses conductor protection for installations greater than 1,000V in Part IX. As outlined in Sec. 240.100, conductors operating at greater than 1,000V need to be protected at the point where they receive their supply. Although this is the same rule we find for low-voltage conductors in Sec. 240.21, the second part of that same sentence goes on to say that the conductors can be protected at an alternative location when designed under engineering supervision. Presumably this could mean that the overcurrent protection device(s) could be located in the switchgear that is being supplied by the conductors. What exactly does this mean to the design engineer?

Transformer secondary conductors on systems greater than 1,000V can be installed unprotected at the source only where studies have been performed under engineering supervision to ensure that the conductors will not be damaged if a through fault or an overcurrent condition occurs. In other words, instead of having black and white NEC rules like those found for installations less than 1,000V, the onus lies with the design engineer and the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) to ensure that the installation is safe.

A common method utilized by the design engineer is to create a relay coordination study. The relay coordination study will indicate how the transformer secondary conductors are adequately protected. Another common method of protecting transformer secondary conductors on systems greater than 1,000V is to include them within the transformer differential relay zone of protection.

As a footnote, it’s important to note the term “engineering supervision” isn’t defined in the Code at this time. It is used throughout the Code, and several unsuccessful attempts over the years have been made to define this term. It’s been my observation that the most prevalent interpretation means calculations must be performed under the supervision of a licensed, professionally registered engineer. As with any other Code interpretation though, until this term is defined by the NEC, it is ultimately up to the AHJ to determine what it means.

© 2016 Fluor Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Eddie Guidry | Senior Fellow

Eddie Guidry is a senior fellow with Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Sugar Land, Texas. He is highly skilled in electrical and control systems for industrial construction, design, and engineering (both domestic and abroad). The majority of Eddie’s 38 years of experience includes upstream and downstream portions of petrochemical plants and refineries. He is also heavily experienced in water and wastewater treatment facilities. Eddie is very active in the development of U.S. national (ANSI) and international codes and standards, and has been a principal member of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) National Electrical Code (NEC) committee since 1999 and NFPA’s National Advisory Committee on Electrical Safety Research since 2008. Eddie, who has also developed and conducted many electrical courses and seminars over the years, currently holds the corporate Master Electrician license for Fluor Corporation in the State of Texas and is also an ICC/IAEI certified electrical inspector.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Electrical Conduit Comparison Chart

CHAMPION FIBERGLASS electrical conduit is a lightweight, durable option that provides lasting savings when compared to other materials. Compare electrical conduit types including...

Fiberglass Electrical Conduit Chemical Resistance Chart

This information is provided solely as a guide since it is impossible to anticipate all individual site conditions. For specific applications which are not covered in this guide...

Considerations for Direct Burial Conduit

Installation type plays a key role in the type of conduit selected for electrical systems in industrial construction projects. Above ground, below ground, direct buried, encased...

How to Calculate Labor Costs

Most important to accurately estimating labor costs is knowing the approximate hours required for project completion. Learn how to calculate electrical labor cost.