Violations

Illustrated Catastrophes

June 1, 2008

Gary Parker, P.E., Burns & McDonnell, Centennial, Colo., found a circuit breaker panel installation that's gone through a few changes that do not comply with the NEC.

Joe Tedesco

As usual, never consider the following commentary associated with these photos as a formal interpretation of the National Electrical Code (NEC). Without criticizing anyone or any product, the following scenarios present us with serious safety questions.

All references are based on the 2008 NEC.

A VIOLATION WITH SOME STING

Ecmweb Com Nec Illustrated Catastrophes 806ecm I Cpic1

Gary Parker, P.E., Burns & McDonnell, Centennial, Colo., found a circuit breaker panel installation that's gone through a few changes that do not comply with the NEC. “The installation was found on the exterior of a water storage tank,” says Parker. “If there ever was an interior cover in this panel, it was not found. It was probably lost when the cord and receptacle were added. The circuits supplied 120V power to the tank cathodic protection rectifier and level transmitter. When you look closely at the bottom of the panel, you can see the terminal bar with grounded (neutral) and equipment-grounding conductors connected together. I am sure the wasps enjoyed their home on top of the circuit breaker. This installation was removed and replaced with all new Code-compliant equipment and wiring methods.”

Cord connections of this type, located in an enclosure, are not permitted but may be considered as noted in the Fine Print Note (FPN) of 400.10 (Pull at Joints and Terminals). The FPN states, “Some methods of preventing pull on a cord from being transmitted to joints or terminals are knotting the cord, winding with tape, and fittings designed for the purpose.”

In addition, connection of the grounded (neutral) conductor and equipment-grounding conductor in this enclosure violates 408.40 (Grounding of Panelboards).

NON-MOVING VIOLATION

Ecmweb Com Nec Illustrated Catastrophes 806ecm I Cpic2

Marc VanOstrand, an electrician with Star Electric in Roanoke, Va., recently ran across this ridiculous installation. “This is what you do if it costs too much to move it,” says VanOstrand.

No rule would recognize the installation of the service drop passing through the house! As noted in 230.3 (One Building or Other Structure Not to Be Supplied Through Another), “Service conductors supplying a building or other structure shall not pass through the interior of another building or structure.”

This service drop is also required to be installed so as to comply with 230.24(B) [Vertical Clearance for Service-Drop Conductors].

Found a Code Violation? E-mail your photos (no cell phone images, please) to Joe Tedesco at [email protected]

About the Author

Joe Tedesco

Tedesco served the industry in many roles during his career. He was a director, senior electrical code instructor for National Technology Transfer, Inc. and American Trainco, Inc.. He was also a codes, standards and seminar specialist for the International Association of Electrical Inspectors and an electrical field service specialist for the National Fire Protection Association in Quincy, Mass. He ran his own business as an NEC consultant and is a Massachusetts licensed master electrician and journeyman electrician and certified electrical inspector (one and two family 2A; General 2B, and Plan Review, 2C). Tedesco also wrote articles for CEE News and EC&M (Code Violations Illustrated and What's Wrong Here?) for more than 15 years and helped launched the Moving Violations video series.