Ecmweb Com Nec Whats Wrong Here Tank Breaker Box 2 Web
Ecmweb Com Nec Whats Wrong Here Tank Breaker Box 2 Web
Ecmweb Com Nec Whats Wrong Here Tank Breaker Box 2 Web
Ecmweb Com Nec Whats Wrong Here Tank Breaker Box 2 Web
Ecmweb Com Nec Whats Wrong Here Tank Breaker Box 2 Web

What's Wrong Here?

Dec. 27, 2007
Hint: Low rent, no heat

How well do you know the Code? Think you can spot violations the original installer either ignored or couldn't identify? Here's your chance to moonlight as an electrical inspector and second-guess someone else's work from the safety of your living room or office. Joe Tedesco, who has a knack for finding shoddy electrical work, did the dirty work and found this mess. Now it's your turn to identify the violation.

Find the Answer

Gary Parker, a professional engineer with Burns & McDonnell in Centennial, Colo., sent us this photo of a circuit breaker panelboard installation that has obviously gone through some changes that do not comply with the NEC.

“We found this installation on the exterior of a water storage tank,” says Parker. “The interior cover of this cabinet was nowhere to be found. It was probably lost when the "pigtail" cord and cap was added. These circuits supplied 120V power to the tank’s cathodic protection rectifier and level transmitter. When you look close at the bottom of the panel, you can see the terminal bar with grounded (neutral) and grounding conductors connected together.

“I am sure the wasps enjoyed their warm home on top of the circuit breaker. We’re currently removing and replacing this setup with all new Code-complying equipment and wiring methods.”

Hey Gary, I think the cover is over there near the pile of trash buried under the leaves. These exposed conductors are readily accessible; just have to open the door! I see that they didn’t even run an equipment-grounding conductor from the cord, probably because it didn’t have one.

The method used here to supply the cord cap pigtail from this location is not one that is recognized by Art. 400. I imagine it was only meant to be “temporary,” and just overlooked; however, this would not meet the requirements listed in Art. 590 either.

> Try Another Quiz

About the Author

Joe Tedesco

Tedesco served the industry in many roles during his career. He was a director, senior electrical code instructor for National Technology Transfer, Inc. and American Trainco, Inc.. He was also a codes, standards and seminar specialist for the International Association of Electrical Inspectors and an electrical field service specialist for the National Fire Protection Association in Quincy, Mass. He ran his own business as an NEC consultant and is a Massachusetts licensed master electrician and journeyman electrician and certified electrical inspector (one and two family 2A; General 2B, and Plan Review, 2C). Tedesco also wrote articles for CEE News and EC&M (Code Violations Illustrated and What's Wrong Here?) for more than 15 years and helped launched the Moving Violations video series.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Electrical Conduit Comparison Chart

CHAMPION FIBERGLASS electrical conduit is a lightweight, durable option that provides lasting savings when compared to other materials. Compare electrical conduit types including...

Fiberglass Electrical Conduit Chemical Resistance Chart

This information is provided solely as a guide since it is impossible to anticipate all individual site conditions. For specific applications which are not covered in this guide...

Considerations for Direct Burial Conduit

Installation type plays a key role in the type of conduit selected for electrical systems in industrial construction projects. Above ground, below ground, direct buried, encased...

How to Calculate Labor Costs

Most important to accurately estimating labor costs is knowing the approximate hours required for project completion. Learn how to calculate electrical labor cost.