How Con Edison Scrambled to Restore Power

Nov. 2, 2001
A lot of media attention focused on the heroics of the fire and rescue crews searching through the rubble at the WTC attack site—and for good reason. But at the same time, the local electric utility, Con Edison, should be commended, as it marshaled some 850 workers to restore electric service to nearly all of its 12,000 commercial and residential customers in the area within eight days. To accomplish

A lot of media attention focused on the heroics of the fire and rescue crews searching through the rubble at the WTC attack site—and for good reason. But at the same time, the local electric utility, Con Edison, should be commended, as it marshaled some 850 workers to restore electric service to nearly all of its 12,000 commercial and residential customers in the area within eight days. To accomplish this task, the utility cut and isolated the distribution circuits around the WTC and a pair of destroyed substations as well as strung almost 36 miles of cable for temporary use on the streets.

According to Con Edison, it will replace the “36 miles of extension cords” with 100 miles of 5-in duct by April 2002 to encase medium-voltage, oil-filled power cables, and other types of circuits to serve the first of the two destroyed substations. Con Edison expects to rebuild the second substation in time for the peak summer power demand of 2003.

Representatives of three major area electrical contractors, including Fischbach & Moore Electric, Inc., Forest Electric Corp., and E-J Electric Installation Co., sit on the energy subcommittee of the New York Building Congress. The NYC Rebuild Task Force has specifically asked this subcommittee to review the impacts of NYC’s energy needs as a result of the WTC attack. Members of this team will review system capability, reliability, and redundancy as well as the system’s ability to meet immediate and future peak energy demands.

About the Author

Joseph R. Knisley | Lighting Consultant

Joe earned a BA degree from Queens College and trained as an electronics technician in the U.S. Navy. He is a member of the IEEE Communications Society, Building Industry Consulting Service International (BICSI), and IESNA. Joe worked on the editorial staff of Electrical Wholesaling magazine before joining EC&M in 1969. He received the Jesse H. Neal Award for Editorial Excellence in 1966 and 1968. He currently serves as the group's resident expert on the topics of voice/video/data communications technology and lighting.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Electrical Conduit Comparison Chart

CHAMPION FIBERGLASS electrical conduit is a lightweight, durable option that provides lasting savings when compared to other materials. Compare electrical conduit types including...

Fiberglass Electrical Conduit Chemical Resistance Chart

This information is provided solely as a guide since it is impossible to anticipate all individual site conditions. For specific applications which are not covered in this guide...

Considerations for Direct Burial Conduit

Installation type plays a key role in the type of conduit selected for electrical systems in industrial construction projects. Above ground, below ground, direct buried, encased...

How to Calculate Labor Costs

Most important to accurately estimating labor costs is knowing the approximate hours required for project completion. Learn how to calculate electrical labor cost.