Preventing OSHA Citations for Control of Hazardous Energy, Part 1

Learn about OSHA's lockout/tagout regulations (29CFR 1910.147), which require controlling all energy sources during maintenance to prevent accidental machine start-up.

Key Takeaways

  • OSHA's 29CFR 1910.147 standard mandates controlling all energy sources — electrical, mechanical, pneumatic, hydraulic, and chemical — during machine servicing to prevent injuries.
  • The regulation applies specifically to maintenance and servicing activities, excluding normal operation unless safety devices are bypassed or safety points are accessed.
  • Employers must develop and implement comprehensive lockout/tagout (LOTO) programs to ensure machines are properly disabled before maintenance begins in order to reduce the risk of accidental energization and injury.

In terms of sheer number, citations for violating hazardous energy control (lockout/tagout, aka LOTO) typically hit about the middle of OSHA’s annual list of violations with the most citations. To avoid being one of those companies, begin with understanding the scope, application, and purpose of 29CFR 1910.147, sometimes referred as “the LOTO regs.”

This standard (29CFR 1910.147) “covers the servicing and maintenance of machines and equipment in which the unexpected energization or start up of the machines or equipment, or release of stored energy could cause injury to employees” [29CFR 1910.147(a)(1)(i)].

Did you notice there’s no qualifier before “energy”? It does not say electrical energy — it just says energy. Energy can be kinetic, for example, when the ram on a 100-ton press is not sitting at its lowest position. A coiled spring is another form of stored energy. Energy might be stored pneumatically, hydraulically, or chemically. Often, it’s not the energy itself that is the danger, but rather, what that energy propels or operates.

It is not enough to lock out the breaker. You must control all of the sources of hazardous energy. This can include bringing the ram down, bleeding off the compressed air, opening the bypass valve, pulling the lever to release the spring, and so forth. In short, if it might move and injure an employee, you must ensure it does not move. You prevent current from moving through branch-circuit conductors by opening the supply breaker (or other disconnecting device) and then locking it in the open position. You may have to do something analogous with the air-driven cutting tool in front of which a maintenance worker might put his hand.

There are five exceptions noted in 29CFR 1910.147(a)(1)(ii)(A) through (E). For example, it doesn’t apply to oil and gas well drilling and servicing.

Now, let’s move on to the application. It’s similar to the scope, in that it applies to the control of energy during “servicing and/or maintenance of machines and equipment” [29CFR 1910.147(a)(2(i)]. It does not apply to normal operation [29CFR 1910.147(a)(2)(ii)], unless an employee is required to:

  • Remove a guard, bypass, or other safety device.
  • Place any part of his body into an area that is referred to as the “point of operation” or where an associated danger exists during a machine operating cycle. For example, an operator manually feeds a punch press by placing a new blank under the punch.

It also does not apply to:

  • Cord-and-plug-connected equipment where the employee has exclusive control of the plug and can unplug the equipment to prevent it from starting. The same logic extends to battery powered equipment, so for example, you remove the battery from your reciprocating saw before changing the blade.
  • Hot tap operations involving transmission and distribution.

Which brings us to the purpose [29CFR 1910.147(a)(3)]. It is for the employer to establish a program and utilize procedures “for affixing appropriate lockout devices or tagout devices to energy isolating devices and to otherwise disable machines or equipment to prevent unexpected energization, start-up, or release of stored energy….”. That sentence then concludes with the whole point of 29CFR 1910.147, which is “to prevent injury to employees.”

About the Author

Mark Lamendola

Mark Lamendola

Mark is an expert in maintenance management, having racked up an impressive track record during his time working in the field. He also has extensive knowledge of, and practical expertise with, the National Electrical Code (NEC). Through his consulting business, he provides articles and training materials on electrical topics, specializing in making difficult subjects easy to understand and focusing on the practical aspects of electrical work.

Prior to starting his own business, Mark served as the Technical Editor on EC&M for six years, worked three years in nuclear maintenance, six years as a contract project engineer/project manager, three years as a systems engineer, and three years in plant maintenance management.

Mark earned an AAS degree from Rock Valley College, a BSEET from Columbia Pacific University, and an MBA from Lake Erie College. He’s also completed several related certifications over the years and even was formerly licensed as a Master Electrician. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and past Chairman of the Kansas City Chapters of both the IEEE and the IEEE Computer Society. Mark also served as the program director for, a board member of, and webmaster of, the Midwest Chapter of the 7x24 Exchange. He has also held memberships with the following organizations: NETA, NFPA, International Association of Webmasters, and Institute of Certified Professional Managers.

Sign up for our eNewsletters
Get the latest news and updates

Voice Your Opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EC&M, create an account today!